October 22, 2008 – 11:57 pm : Comments (13)

Thomas L. Friedman’s Brain is Hot, Flat and Crowded

Captain Obvious writes another book built on a stupid metaphor.

Thomas L. Friedman just sucks.  We’ll start there.  Oh, and here too: since I have in the past written reviews of things I haven’t seen or read (like my virtual review of the Sex And The City movie) I ought to tell you up front that I have NOT read Hot, Flat and Crowded and have absolutely no intention of doing so.  I’m also quite sure that it’s entirely unnecessary.  I’ll get to why in a moment.

But first, back to what I was saying before, which is that Thomas L. Friedman sucks.  I know this because I did read as much of his last book “The World is Flat” as I could stomach (which was about five pages.)  I also saw him speak a couple of years ago.  Don’t do that.  He’s bad enough in small doses on television, but hearing him regurgitate the bad metaphors and boring anecdotes on which he’s built an fanbase of sycophantic Barnes & Nobel browsers and editorial page writers was enough to cause me to consider the consequences of thrusting my Pilot V5 pen into my left eye.  Thomas L. Friedman is exactly the sort of huckster I hate most: taking what is immediately apparent to anyone that thinks about it for a minute, recasting it in a metaphor that makes an audience feel smart for understanding it, then serving it up with a “gosh, isn’t this brilliant of me” verve to the bottom-feeders that hang starry-eyed on every word.  People that can leave the event (or finish the book) feeling like they’ve gotten smarter and sporting one more conversation starter for the next cocktail party they find themselves feeling inadequate at: “Hey, have you read the new Friedman? He says the world is FLAT!”

One of these things is flat.  It's not the world.  I've provided additional visual clues to aid you.

One of these things is flat. It's not the world. I've provided additional visual clues if you have trouble with the process of elimination.

That book, which other NY Times columnists bravely called “brilliant,” seems to have built on a statement made to him by the CEO of Infosys, Nandan Nilekani, while Thomas L. Friedman was in Bangalore.  During a conversation about doing business globally, Nilekani used the phrase “the playing field is being leveled.”   Thomas L. Friedman relates how he couldn’t get it out of his mind and stewed on it until he decided that what Nilekani was actually saying is that world is flat.  He delivers this experience in the book as if he’s realized that Nilekani has purposely passed on a piece of very secret, very powerful information:

I kept chewing on that phrase: “The playing field is being leveled.”

What Nandan is saying, I thought, is that the playing field is being flattened… Flattened? Flattened? My God, he’s telling me the world is flat!

Eureka!  A premise for a book to be sold to lazy, wanna-be intellectuals.  I think I could hear the pop of his boner from here.  The next time Friedman wants a concept for a book, I suggest he save the airfare to India and just sit in on a marketing meeting in a SOHO loft: there’s no shortage of silly idiomatic expressions and metaphors being bandied about at one of those.  But wait!  My advice isn’t necessary (stupid Brad.)  Thomas L. Friedman doesn’t need new metaphors.  He’s actually able to recycle his shitty ones, which he’s done with his new book “The World is Hot, Flat, and Crowded.”  I hope I’m not ruining it for you if I tell you that in this one we learn (ohmigod!) that that the world isn’t just flat, it’s hot and crowded too!

His work here is done, for now.  But fear not, citizen! Whenever and wherever there's a need for bad metaphors and books about things you should be able to figure out yourself, Captain Obvious will be there.

His work here is done, for now. But fear not, citizen! Whenever and wherever there's a need for bad metaphors and books about things you should be able to figure out yourself, Captain Obvious will be there.

Let’s hear it in his words though:

The world also has a problem: It is getting hot, flat, and crowded. That is, global warming, the stunning rise of middle classes all over the world, and rapid population growth have converged in a way that could make our planet dangerously unstable….

I am convinced that the best way for America to solve its big problem - the best way for America to get its “groove” back - is for us to take the lead in solving the world’s big problem.

Heady shit, right?  And it goes on for 448 pages.  O.K., so the world’s hot (global warming) and crowded (global fucking.)  And?  And then Friedman drops this bomb: the next big global industry is ET.  Not E.T., with the finger, and the bike, and Elliot, and the Reeses Pieces product placement.  Thomas L. Friedman’s ET is Energy Technology.  As in wind, solar, etc.  That’s it.  That’s the book.  The world is hot, flat, crowded and there’s a big opportunity in energy technology (I refuse to support his attempt to get another meme attributed to him, especially one as stupid as “ET”).  The rest you can probably figure out on your own.  Only Thomas L. Friedman can take an idea that could almost fill a four page pamphlet and expand it into a 448 page book.  Do I even need to explain why it’s entirely unnecessary to read the fucking thing now?

Anyway, he’s shilling it all over the television so reading it is doubly unnecessary.  I’ve seen him on Maher (who is skilled: he conducted the entire interview with his lips on Friedman’s ass,) I’ve seen him on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, and if I see him again I’ll take it as a sign of the apocalypse.

If you’re still with me, you might be asking yourself: “Why are you being such a pissy bitch about it, Brad?” So let me say this about that:  The crap in Thomas L. Friedman’s book, the tripe he spouts on television (did you know that you can fit “ET” into an answer to any question?  I didn’t.) is exactly the sort of pseudo-intellectual poo that passes for intelligent conversation these days and that makes me fucking nuts.  You wonder why people have stopped thinking for themselves?  Maybe because verbose gasbags like Thomas L. Friedman will do all their thinking for them, no matter what the subject.  Thomas L. Friedman’s books remind me of shitty self-help books: all the obvious answers for why mommy didn’t like you without having to figure them out for yourself.

By the way, maybe mommy didn’t like you because you did shit like read bad self-help books.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 21, 2008 – 11:42 am : Comments (4)

A Nice Plug For The Bone

As my wife might say: Ew.

Yeah, I didn’t mean it that way.  I just meant that Bone In The Fan got a very nice mention over at writer Nancy Rommelman’s blog, which I appreciate muchly.  Not only does she have good taste in blogs, she’s got writing chops, so go spend some time checking out some of her articles and posts.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 13, 2008 – 3:22 pm : Comments (7)

The Lesser of 14 Evils

So many choices for President.  So few good ones.

There will be 14 candidates for President on the ballot in Florida. In addition to Obama and McCain, we can choose from the following:

  • Gene Amondson: Prohibition Party.  Now I, for one, had no idea that this party even existed.  Didn’t we learn our lesson a few decades ago about this?  Their candidate is a landscape painter.
  • Chuck Baldwin: Constitution Party.  I don’t know much about him except that he used to be pretty wired into the Republican party.  And I’m too lazy to look into it.
  • Bob Barr: Libertarian Party.  A turncoat, a fraud, or someone who has seen the light, depending on how you look at it.  I’m a Libertarian, but Barr was a monumental social conservative for a long time.  His running mate is a douche.
  • James Harris: Socialist Workers Party. Oh please.
  • Charles Jay: Boston Tea Party.  Another libertarian party, and a play on words too!  Also a pain in the ass to find on the web, due to their name.  Fully 500 members. Their site is here, if you’re interested.
  • Alan Keyes: American Independent Party. Line one of their website: “We Acknowledge the Creator’s Gracious Gifts.” And so on….
  • Gloria La Riva: Party of Socialism and Liberation. Because if there’s one thing history has told us, it’s that socialism leads to liberation.  Morons. Their site is now enhanced with 30% more Che!
  • Cynthia McKinney: Green Party.  Yawn.  I’ve done my green rants.  Boring.
  • Brian Moore: Socialist Party.  As opposed to the Socialist Workers Party and the Party of Socialism and Liberation.
  • Ralph Nader: Ecology Party.  You already know how I feel about this stupidhead.
  • Thomas Robert Stevens: Objectivist Party.  These guys built their entire party around the writings of Ayn Rand.  What next, the Lion Witch and Wardrobe Pary?
  • Gary Nettles (qualified as write-in).  Who cares?

My point being, well, nothing really.  Except that apaprently anyone can get on the ballot here, which actually isn’t such a bad thing (I wonder if they’ll let me nominate my colon.)  As for me, I’m still in the undecided column (I believe it’s too late to get my colon on the ballot) though leaning (again)  towards voting Libertarian.

Look, I want to like Obama, I really do.   He’s a likeable guy.  I think he genuinely cares about doing the right thing.  He’s smart.  I like his ideas about pork (the money kind, not the pig kind - I don’t know how he feels about bacon.) And he might just shake things up in a good way.  And maybe, just maybe the Dems won’t completely fuck everything up in four years.

I don't care how you feel about the guy.  This photo looks like a Sears photo gallery shot from 1972.  Awful.  Even so, he just looks so damn LIKEABLE.  Plus, his daughter Sasha (in his lap) is WAY cute.

I don't care how you feel about the guy, this photo looks like a Sears photo gallery shot from 1972. Or like someting you'd find in my high scool year book, taken when we all went to the "No Nukes" concert at Battery Park in 1981. Awful. Even so, he's just so damn LIKEABLE. Plus, his daughter Sasha (in his lap) is WAY cute.

But then I think about his windfall profit tax idea, and his “save jobs from being shipped overseas” rhetoric, and his pro-Mexico/US-wall position, his failure to stand up and say something truthful about the economy right now while encouraging the $700 billion package, and Joe Biden’s creepy metamorphosis into Carrottop, and I think “well, maybe they can.”  Fuck things up I mean.

Not that there aren’t plenty of good things about him too.  But you can figure those things out for yourself.  Try starting with his website.

And while I’m not a huge fan of Barr’s and I actively dislike Root (that’d be Wayne Allyn Root, Barr’s running mate who, as Doug Stanhope points out, spells his middle name like he’s in an 80’s hair band), they aren’t going to win.  So I’m back to thinking that a vote for the Libertarian party is the only way to be heard at all when I say that the government has it’s head up its own ass.  Really far, too.  Like, inhumanly far.

In the end it’s a moot point.  Neither candidate will listen to libertarian ideas, Obama will probably win, and that’ll be that.  But I will say that I’m open to being completely wrong about his policies.  I really hope that he’s everything that the Starbucks baristas, trustafarians and leftist women everywhere believe he will be, by which I mean I hope he makes useful, meaningful changes in Washington, gets our servicemen out of Iraq, starts to restore our International Street Cred (ISC) and gets people interested in the political process again.

If we can just keep him away from gun legislation, protectionist trade policies, windfall profit taxes and the complete socialization of banks and corporations this might not be so bad.  I’m not holding my breath though.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 8, 2008 – 12:33 am : Comments (10)

Obama McCain Presidential Debate II: “That One” Won.

Obama does fine, McCain not so much.  But what does “win” mean, anyway?

I watched the debate tonight.  I know there are a couple of you that won’t agree with me, but here’s the deal: Obama won, and won pretty damn big.  And I actually wanted McCain to win.  Not because I’m a fan of his, but because I hate agreeing with large crowds of baristas.  I guess I’ll have to console myself by taking the incredibly arrogant position that I, in fact, have good reasons for thinking Obama won.  On the other hand, he could have pooped the stage called McCain “Captain Dusty Farts” and the trustafarians would have still picked him as the winner.

Big reasons for me?

  1. Let me tell you my friends, having the government buy your house to at an overvalued price so it can resell it to you at its current market value is the most retarded fucking idea I’ve ever heard of.  I shouldn’t have to explain why, my friends.  And it would be stupid even if the government wasn’t broke.
  2. Also my friends, if I had to hear McCain explain one more time how Americans are the smartest, best workers anywhere, so of course we’ll win, I was going to suck back a jar of mayonnaise.
  3. Two words my friends: “that one.” Creepy.  Reminded me of a pissed off dad.
  4. Too many attacks on Obama rather than simply answering the questions, my friends.  McCain just sounded whiny. And by the way my friends, does anyone actually believe that what Obama said was that he was going to attack Pakistan (and by the way, did that seem ironic to you?  That McCain was bringing up talking first, and Obama was talking about crossing the border to cap Bin Laden?)
  5. Obama actually appeared to listen to McCain my friends, while McCain looked like he was just waiting to criticize him.  It looked disrepectful my friends.
  6. Well my friends, McCain seemed really fucking old.  Old age, old ideas, old stories, old sense of humor.  Sorry.
  7. Obama didn’t screw anything up.  And he seemed smarter.  Way smarter, my friends.
  8. Me. My friends, I’m an avowed disliker (is that a word?) of both parties and all four candidates but my gut tells me Obama would be a much better President.  Of course then I calm the fuck down, stop acting like a horny schoolgirl and start considering some of his actual positions, and my bowels clench up and I start compulsively farting and twitching.

A few more thoughts: Obama’s health care plan is completely flakey, his class warfare shit makes me want to power-puke, the simplistic regulation/de-regulation argument is a pandering pile of dog discharge that means absolutely nothing, neither of them said jack shit about a realistic way to deal with the economy  - which isn’t surprising since they were both in favor of the horrible $700 billion bailout package - and we heard nothing really new from either of them.  I will say that McCain’s close was pretty good.  But so was Obama’s.

Question: What does “win” mean anyway?  Is the winner the person who looked best, answered best and appeared most Presidential?  Or is the winner the person who did the best job of swinging people over to voting for them?

Answer: It doesn’t matter, because That One won either way.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 7, 2008 – 7:48 pm : Comments (2)

Democrats Turning Into Carrottop?

Joe Biden’s debate appearance renews questions about cult leader Carrottop’s power.

I was seriously disturbed during the VP debate last week.  And it wasn’t the Palin Wink ™ that pushed me over the edge.  It was the fact that much like Al Gore before him, Joe Biden has begun to look like Carrottop.  Now if you know me, you probably know I’m no fan of Biden’s (we can start with his “war on drugs” if you want) but this isn’t about that.  It’s about what appears to be a very strange and very scary cult led by a second rate Vegas prop comic.  You think Jim Jones harshed his followers?  At least they went out looking vaguely human (albeit a bit bloaty.)  I shudder to think what these guys are going to look like in a few years.  Take a look:

Photos of Al Gore, Joe Biden, and the hive leader.

Photos of the hive leader, Al Gore, and Joe Biden.

It’s clear to me now that a few months ago when I posted about Carrottop and Gore looking alike, I wasn’t seeing the big picture.  I’ve stumbled upon something here, something big.  The mainstream press hasn’t written word one about this either - because it goes deep, baby.  All this bullshit people are slinging about Obama being a muslim terrorist is absurd.

The real danger is coming from Vegas, it’s got red hair, and it’s carrying a case full of remarkably un-funny props.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 7, 2008 – 2:27 pm : Comments (0)

Church Advertising Update

Good News For Sinners!

You may have seen some of my prior posts about the church down the street from me and the wacky slogans they put up in front of the joint to try and build up their membership.  If you haven’t, you can check out the whole lot of them by clicking here to see a list of all the ones I’ve weighed in on.

At any rate, this week’s pitch goes a little something like this:

It is unlikely that there’ll be a decrease in the wages of sin.

This is awesome news.  First of all,  I could definitely use some extra money right now and I didn’t even know the church was hiring (it’s even within walking distance.)  Better still though is what they’re paying for.  I mean, I knew that you could probably get work for doing really nasty shit like stealing things or killing people, but I’m a lover not a fighter, so that’s just not my bag.  But the news that there are plenty more sins to choose from if you’re looking for work is, yeah I’ll say it, revelatory!   For example, did you know you can earn big money for:

  • Craftiness (2 Cor 4:2)
  • Following the desires of the mind (Eph 2:3)
  • Being Carnal or worldly (1 Cor 3:1-3; Ro 8:6-8)
  • Eating and drinking with the drunken (Mt 24:49)
  • Fornication (Acts 15:20; Mk 7:21; Ro 1:29)

And I’m pretty sure I can do all five of those at once, so I’m figuring my mortgage will be covered at least. But if those aren’t your cup of tea, there are plenty of others on the list of 667 sins posted here, (you knew they wouldn’t stop at 666, right? And they claim the list isn’t even complete!)  So there’s way more to choose from.  Like, did you know that “foolishness” is a sin?  Well, it is (Mk 7:22, Titus 3:3).  So is “debate” (Ro 1:29,) “pride” (Ja 4:6; Ro 1:30; Pv 16:18; Ps 10:4,) and “not honoring the president” (1 Pe 2:17,) (so the Presidential debates tonight should go down in flames.  Literally.)

Got kids?  Tell them they can’t play Xbox and get paid big bucks for “provoking your children to wrath” (Eph 6:4.)  Do you like going out on the town?  How’d you like to get paid for “dressing indecently” (1 Tim 2:9; Pv 7:10) which could probably earn your boyfriend a few bucks for “refusing to leave the great harlot” (Rev 18:4; 2 Cor 6:16,17,) and if you’re lucky you’ll both be earning crazy ducats for “sex outside of marriage” (1 Cor 5:11; 6:18,20; Ex 22:16,17.)

There’s just so much good stuff to choose from I don’t know where to start.  But riotous living (Lk 15:13,18) sounds fun, so maybe I’ll go with that until I get an assignment from god.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 6, 2008 – 1:59 pm : Comments (1)

Available For Work: Snarky 45-Year-Old With No Readily Identifiable Skills

No, I’m not talking about Sarah Palin (I think she’s only 42 anyway.)

It’s me you silly geese.  Many of you know that I work with Joanna at her awesome body product company Product Body, but I’m looking to bring home more bacon. 

Many of you also know what I’ve done, or what I’m good at (and what I’m not,) so I won’t post a frigging resume.  Suffice it to say that I’ve been successful bootstrapping and running businesses, and project management, copywriting, brand and/or internet consulting, and anything where I get to run stuff and boss people around is in my wheelhouse.  And by the way, Product Body is not being abandoned, so those of you that are big fans need not panic.

I just think it’s time for a change for me - plus we need more income around here.  I do have one other project I’m working on (pitching a new television show,) but I have no idea if that is going to work out - so I’m looking around for something new for act III.  Relocation is absolutely on the table (if anyone has a cool job in Tokyo, sign me up right now - domo arigato is the extent of my Japanese however.)  I’m open to pretty much anything but selling my sweet Irish/German ass, but would really love to sink my teeth into some regular writing.

So if you need someone, or knows someone who needs someone, or knows someone who’s cousin knows this guy that heard about this chick that has a friend who’s company needs someone….let me know.

You can find out a modicum more about me at one of my otro website Brad C Schmidt - there’s a link there back here (so you can go in circles all day,) as well as links to my business and Product Body.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]
October 3, 2008 – 4:08 pm : Comments (13)

Once And For All: I Am Not A “Computer Guy.”

And I don’t do websites, either.

Let me clear this up right here.  I don’t fucking build websites.  I’m not a coder, I’m not a designer.  But apparently, since once upon a time I started and ran a company that did that (pretty damn well, too, if I do say so myself,) and since I designed the Product Body brand and labels and built the Product Body website (and a few others, admittedly) people think that’s what I do. But it’s not. It’s really not.

 

O.K., yeah.  It looks pretty bitchin'.  But I did it under duress.

O.K., yeah. It looks pretty bitchin'. But I did it under duress.

I did that work because I had to do that work.  I knew what I wanted the end result to be and I beat my head against a wall for a long time until it got close enough that I didn’t want to jump in front of a train every time I looked at it.  I moved graphics around, consulted with Joanna and friends, and kept tweaking stuff.  I took code apart, looked at it line by line, and used (my occasionally pathetically faulty) logic to figure out how to change it to make it do what I wanted.  Or get it close at least.  But design and coding? It’s just not what I’m good at, and I find it highly unpleasant.

 

And that’s not only because of the things I’m not good at, but because of the things I AM good at.  Like brand consulting, copywriting, business consulting, and knowing what works and what doesn’t.  Which makes me both the guy that designed/built our site and designed the packaging AND they guy that sits in judgement of the guy that designed/built our site as well as designed the packaging.  And that guy, the designing guy that is, doesn’t do work up to the standards of the sit-in-judgment guy. Which pisses the judgement guy off and makes the design guy feel like a douche.

 

The demanding me berating the pathetic, not-good-enough me. No fun at all for either me.

The demanding me berating the pathetic, not-good-enough me. No fun at all for either me.

Since they’re both me I just end up duking it out with myself.   Which is not fun, I tell you what.  I’m not saying the Product Body site and the brand design is crap, it isn’t.  But it’s not good enough for the judgement guy.  The copywriting though, that I’m pretty happy with; even proud of.

 

Point is, no matter how many fucking times I try and explain this to people, they still keep asking me if I want to design a site for them, or write some code, or do some “computer guy” thing because “you’re a computer guy, right?”  I suppose the offers are nice, and I’m quite sure that people are trying to be nice and supportive and all that crap, and I’m not trying to sound ungrateful for the offers, but NO I fucking do NOT want to design your site, nor do I want to build your site.  Because that’s not what I do, and it’s not what I CAN do.  And frankly, it just reminds me of how shitty I am at it every time someone asks me to do it and I have to explain how shitty I am at it.

Now if you want me to manage production on a site, or a record, or an advertisment, or a television show, or a new brand, or an old brand, or pretty much any sort of project, I’m your man.  Because that I KICK ASS at.

I’m just not a computer guy.

Bookmark and Share
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Simpy] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Email]